The girls hands will be tied behind their backs and their bodies are put in a cloth sack. Then, this human "package" is buried in a hole up to their shoulders. This is to give them an seemingly equal (but nonetheless impossible) chance to escape recognizing her lesser physical strength (men are buried up to their heads).After the two girls have been secured in the hole, people start chanting "Allah hu Akbar" and throw palm sized stones at their heads from a certain distance (a circle is drawn). The stones will be thrown until they die or until they escape out of the hole and crosses the circle. Of course, escaping is impossible, given that their hands are tied behind their backs and they are buried in a hole up to their shoulders. Folks, this is how women are treated by Islamo-fascists. These two girls have been convicted of adultery, neither of them actually committed the "crime" They have already received 9
9 lashes each and await the sentence as described below. Why is there no outrage from the mainstream media, they trip all of their underwear to whine about water boarding...is this not worse? Where is Ms Magazine, who recently refused an ad about the achievements is women in Israel, why are the feminists silent about this out rage? Why is Louise Arbour, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights and (so I have been told) a woman, sitting on her hands? No one really cares about the abuse of women by the Islamo-fascists. But they do try to silence those who speak out, like David Horowitz, during Islamo-facist week Two Women Stoned: Feminists Mum
By David Horowitz, Robert Spencer and Janet Levy FrontPageMagazine.com | 2/7/2008
Two sisters – identified only as Zohreh and Azar – have been convicted of adultery in Iran.
They have now been sentenced to be stoned to death.
Adultery is a crime punishable by death in the Islamic Republic of Iran, in accordance with the canons of Islamic Sharia law. The Iranian Supreme Court has upheld the stoning sentence.
Zohreh and Azar have already received 99 lashes for "illegal relations." Yet they were tried again for the same crime, and convicted of adultery on the evidence of videotape that showed them in the presence of other men while their husbands were absent. The video does not show either of them engaging in any sexual activity at all.
Their crime is non-existent, their trials a miscarriage of justice, and their sentencing a barbarity.
All those who believe in human rights and human dignity should protest against this sentence.
We call upon the Islamic Republic of Iran to drop all prosecution of Zohreh and Azar, and to end punishment by stoning.
We call upon the Islamic Republic of Iran to end the Sharia-inspired and institutionalized discrimination against women that results in their being treated as chattels of men.
We call upon the Islamic Republic of Iran to affirm the equality of dignity of women with men and the equality of rights of all people, women with men, non-Muslims with Muslims, and to implement these principles in their laws.
We call upon the United Nations and human rights organizations to redouble their pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran until it ends its war on the rights of women and human rights in general.
We call upon feminists, including the signers of the statement drafted by The Nation's Katha Pollitt, to join us in protesting this outrage. We continue to be stunned but not surprised by the silence of these feminists who have questioned the authenticity of our concern for Muslim women oppressed by the laws of Islam. The feminists who recently complained that the media has falsely represented them as indifferent to the plight of Muslim women have so far been conspicuously indifferent to the plight of Zohreh and Azar. We call upon these feminists in particular to join us in protesting the violence already done to Zohreh and Azar and the death penalty they face. The Islamic Republic of Iran is an oppressor of women. So far American feminists have failed to support their Muslim sisters. We call on them to join us in doing so now.
5 comments:
yid,i really do not see what the outrage is all about?
just look in our torah,and you will see exactly the same punishment for adultary,desecrating the shabbat,eating on yom kipur
Big difference Harry we don't practice that any more ...and even then the Talmud said that any rabbinical court that kills more than 1 person every 70 years is too bloody
yid,the point is not if we actually do it or not,that is irelevant to our conversation,my point is that once the torah,which we jews believe is the word of g-d'
has on its book,capital punishment in the form of stoning,for adultreses,and sabbath desecrators,
then how could we be outraged at the muslims,for doing something that our torah commands to do?
that was my point
Harry
We also believe that the written torah is on half the torah that the oral torah was given at sinai also. Why this matters is for example the written torah says an eye for an eye. the oral torah says that means the cash value of an eye for an eye...you can't rely on JUST the written torah
yid,you should now better than that,
on the subject of an "eye for an eye" the oral tradition teaches us that what the torah meant with an eye for an eye,was monetary compensation,and not a literal eye for an eye
but on the subject of stoning married women,who comit adultery
our oral law absolutely agrees with it and insists that it is literal,and the fact that it was only carried out in practice only once in 70 years,realy has no relevance to this conversation,
therefore we as believing jews,who believe that the torah is the word of g-d,how can we be outraged if a certain society decides to do exactly what our torah commands us to do
Post a Comment