Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Monday, April 7, 2008

Ron Paul Group Lies to Get Delegates


It seems that Ron Paul has found a new method of getting his way. The Hamas supporting libertarian candidate for the Republican Nomination who's old job was publishing racist newsletters (see Ron Paul, NUT, BIGOT, or BOTH) has decided to try and lie his way to the convention. In the Minnesota congressional district conventions yesterday, Paul's delegates filled out questionnaires promising that they were McCain Supporters... AFTER they were elected as national convention delegates they announced that the supported Paul:
Ron Paul backers 'hijack' delegates
Voting results disputed in Minnesota conventions

Andy Barnett

BLAINE, Minn. – Ron Paul supporters shook things up in at least three of Minnesota's congressional district conventions yesterday when they captured nearly all of the national delegates and alternates for the Republican National Convention this fall.

There was controversy at Minnesota's 6th Congressional District Convention. The district covers part of the Twin Cities metro area and extends to the west and into nearby St. Cloud, Minn. Paul supporters were accused of dirty tricks.

"They hijacked the convention," said Jeff Johnson who serves as Minnesota's
Senate District 15 co-chairman.

Two out of three national delegates elected were Ron Paul supporters and all three of the alternates supported Paul. After the election results were announced at the convention, they were immediately disputed when it was discovered that the candidates had agreed to support John McCain in pre-screening questions.

"I had people coming up to me saying that they wanted to ensure that Ron Paul has a chance to speak at the convention," said Andy Aplikowsky, the vice chairman of the 6th District in Anoka County, "These people hid what their intentions were and that's deceptive."

Prior to the voting, candidates running to be national delegates were screened by a nominating committee and asked two questions.

"We asked them if they were Republican and then asked if they would support John McCain at the national convention" said Aplikowsky. "They had the option to answer yes, no, or maybe."

The answers to these questions were then presented to the body of congressional delegates to take into consideration in the voting process. When it was discovered the elected national delegates were Paul supporters despite saying they would support McCain, the convention erupted in debate

A motion was made to ensure the delegates supported McCain at the national convention.

"I moved that we bind the national delegates and alternates to what they told the nominating committee which is what was reported to the voters," said Aplikowsky.

A heated debate lasting more than an hour followed the motion. Eventually, the motion passed by a slim margin, but not without harsh words and harsh exchanges.

The feeling among many of the congressional delegates who voted was that the Paul supporters had been dishonest. Ron Baert, one of the elected national delegates and a Ron Paul supporter disagreed.

"I don't recall the exact wording of the question (about McCain), and so I wanted to clarify it," he said. "So I said that the endorsement hasn't even taken place yet, but that if McCain were endorsed I would support him, however I did not say I would vote to endorse him at the national convention."

Could the wording of the pre-screening questions have been confusing? Aplikowsky who helped in the process didn't think that was likely.

"There were 98 people who went through the questions and it was explained very thoroughly at the time the nominations report was given to the voters," he said.

The 98 candidate names, and their answers to the pre-screening questions were displayed on an overhead projector as well as on a handout available to voters.

Some Paul supporters wanted to know why the pre-screening questions were asked in the first place, and Baert said he and other Paul backers felt intimidated. So what was the purpose of the questions?

"The intention was to identify people and who they were going to support," said Aplikowski. "It wasn't to keep out Ron Paul supporters but to present that information to the body of delegates to vote on, which is one of the purposes of the nominating committee."

The RNC was contacted by phone while the debate was going on, and, according to party rules, the national delegates must endorse John McCain or their votes won't count. That left some angry.

"If they intended to bind candidates to vote for the presumptive nominee (John McCain), they should've announced this at the beginning," said Paul supporter Jim Sutton. "This convention has never bound delegates to a candidate before. It was a torpedo job against us!"

The Ron Paul Revolution also struck Minnesota's 4th and 5th districts where Paul supporters swept the votes for national delegates and alternates. Minnesota Chairman Ron Carey said that the delegates' decision to not unite behind McCain only hurts the Republican party.

P
aul has remained in the presidential race despite the fact McCain has now earned enough delegates to become the Republican nominee for president.

4 comments:

Scribbler de Stebbing said...

The candidates for delegate were asked if they would support McCain. They were not asked if they would vote for him at national. They agreed they would vote for McCain in the general election.

Unknown said...

Someone Named Emam posted a comment that he was at the convention. I originally let it through but then realized that it was a fake email at the visit originated for California not MN. So sorry Eman..I dont believe you

Unknown said...

Dear person who left the nasty comment using foul language...do the people at Thompson Financial Know what you do in the Office?

Do you kiss your mom with that mouth?

Oh and if you weren't too much of a pussy to leave an email --I would have posted your little love note..

But I guess you just wanted to hide from your company that you screw around at work instead of doing your probably menial tasks


Domain Name tfn.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address 198.80.155.# (Thomson Financial Services)
ISP ANS Communications
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : New Jersey
City : Lincoln Park
Lat/Long : 40.9271, -74.3039 (Map)
Distance : 284 miles
Language English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 800 x 600
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Apr 7 2008 6:01:08 pm
Last Page View Apr 7 2008 6:02:33 pm
Visit Length 1 minute 25 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://us.f562.mail....w=a&head=b&box=Inbox
Visit Entry Page http://yidwithlid.bl...o-get-delegates.html
Visit Exit Page http://yidwithlid.bl...o-get-delegates.html
Out Click Post a Comment
http://www.blogger.c...9404590&isPopup=true
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Apr 7 2008 6:01:08 pm
Visit Number 106,519

Unknown said...

I think the crying baby here is extremely appropriate. For the blogger, that is.