Marxists/Socialists/Communists for Obama

It is not Guilt by association when you let them into your "home".

Marxists/Socialists/Communists for Obama is another one of those groups with a spot on the Official "Obama 08" website. I have not made up any of what you see below just a simple "cut and paste." These people are talking "hard line" Marxist theory, including a revolution of the Proletariat.

The Question to Senator Obama is if you don't believe what these folks are saying why are you giving them a platform ON YOUR OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN SITE?

Marxists/Socialists/Communists for Obama

This group is for self-proclaimed Marxists/Communists/Socialists for the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency. By no means is he a true Marxist, but under Karl Marx's writings we are to support the party with the best interests of the mobilization of the proletariat. Though the Democratic Socialists of America or the Communist Patty of America may have more Socialististic values, it is pointless to vote for these candidates due to the fact that there is virutally no chance they will be elected on a National level. The members of this group are not Leninists, Stalinists, etc. and do not support or condone the actions of North Korea, China, Cuba or any other self-procalimed "Marxist States." They do not in anyway represent the Marxist philosophy nor do they represent Socialism/ Communsim. We support Barack Obama because he knows what is best for the people!

.....According to Marxist doctrine, the proletariat is the only class that can overpower and vanquish the oppressive bourgeoisie. The petty-bourgeoisie was to schismed and could not possibly be organzed into a revloutionary force. The peasntry was to far scattered along geograhpical lines and therefore could also never be orgainzed to topple the bourgeoisie. This, however, was in the 1800's. It would seem that this is no longer the case.

In America, the "pesantry" is not scattered from each other but rather seem to be isolated in certain high-population areas. The peasantry, though, has historically failed as a revolutionary device. Mao Tse-tung took advantage of the egregious amount of pesantry for his Revolution, and all that emergred there was a deformed workers state. Was this due to the pesantry though? Perhaps, but it is important to remeber that the Red Revolution actually succeded with in the Proletariat Revolution, and failed due to Lenin's pathetic abandonment of Marxist philosophy. Also from here emerged a deformed workers state, unable to even attempt communism. So the peastantry may actually be an able mobile for the Revolution, and Maoism may have only failed due to his adherence to Lenin and Stalin's corrupted and twisted "marxist" philolosphies. To nix the idea of a Peasant Revolution is far from logical.

This then leaves the Petty-Bourgeoisie. Are they a possible force of a Revolution? I believe so. Not because I think that they could on there own, but because of the fact that they seemed to have assimilated with the Proletariat. It is no secret that the Proletariat, at least in Marx's defintion of it, is no longer in existence. Long gone are the days of Industrial workers organizing themselves against the malicious Bourgeoisie. Now, due to the fact that the Bourgeosise have ascedened only higher since Marx's time, the bourgeoise have abaonded what little of the petty-bourgeoise that sided with them. They are far above the Petty-bourgeoisie, the Proletariat, and of course the Pesantry. Because most of America is now apart of the growing "service industry", the Proleatariat and the parts of the Petty-Bourgeoisie have assimilated now into the Neo-Proletariat. This is essenstially the ever struggling and disregarded middle class of America. Not the idealistic 'American Dream' Middle class, but the Middle class that must struggle each day with its family and lives on a pay-check to pay-check basis. Although nothing physical is now 'produced' as the proleatriat did, service is produced and is exploited by the bourgeoisie in an eerily similar manner to the near extinct proletariat. The middle class is now made up of the laborers who must face the grueling task of providing the bourgeoisie with power and capital. This assimilation only proves that the Revolution is inevitable. Eventually, the bourgeoisie controlled government will fail to keep the evergrowing masses at bay, and the Revolution will occur. The Bourgeoisie is locked in an eventual self-destrcution due to their own greed. The more they attempt to gain Capital, the more they reap the fruits of the Neo-proletarians labor. The more they do this, and the more society adavances technologically, the more the classes will assmilate. This, of course, leads to more and more dissent until finally the pot boils over and the Revoluiton occurs.

The Neo-proleatarian is now the bearer of the Revolution. Thats why I support Obama. He helps destroy the paradigm of bourgeoisie government, which is best for the Proletariat. In the end, this will only hasten the Revolution even if the Revolution must come as a massive goverment reform.