Obama Destroys "Reagan" Comparison

Senator Barack Obama and his support like to compare the candidate to the late President Ronald Reagan. Yesterday destroyed any rational possibility of ever using that comparison again.

“America is, uh, is no longer, uh, what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, 'I don’t want that future for my children.'” --Barack Obama, 8/7/08, in response to the question of a 7-year old on why he was running for president.

Think about that for a second, and compare that to what Reagan said during his last presidential address:

I’ve spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don’t know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, wind-swept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace, a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity, and if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That’s how I saw it and see it still.

And don't forget that Obama gave that "Optimistic" version of America TO A CHILD !!!

The Senator will be under the radar for a few days, as he goes back to Hawaii for a little vacation (and maybe to find his birth certificate). While he is away read the below, and think about the kind of vision YOU want for America:

Obama's Vision: "America Is No Longer What It Could Be, What It Once Was."

by Hugh Hewitt

“America is, uh, is no longer, uh, what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, 'I don’t want that future for my children.'” --Barack Obama, 8/7/08, in response to the question of a 7-year old on why he was running for president.

Study that for a moment. Let it sinkin.

Ask yourself "What could Barack Obama possibly mean?"

Obama is ending a second dismal week in a row, a run of gaffes with few equals in modern American political history, and he was fixed on beating a retreat to Hawaii, only to be ambushed by a 7 year old.

Commentators immediately recalled the Dukakis-Shaw (the rape-murder of your wife question) and Kennedy-Mudd ("Why do you want to be president?") moments, but hesitated: In those cases candidates had been felled by adults, tripped up by sneaky journalists hiding their traps behind crafty questions.

Obama was felled by a second grader. Asking the same question in essence as had Roger Mudd of Teddy Kennedy. How could Obama not have an answer at the ready?

"Sometimes an empty suit is just an empty suit one" caller to yesterday's program suggested.

Or perhaps Obama just meant that the terrible years under Bush with all the secret arrests, torture and unjust invasions were coming to a close, so we could return to the glory years of Bill Clinton, Madeline Albright and Sandy Berger.

No matter how you analyze it, Obama's latest flub is in the "major" category, and coming after his decision to triple down on the inflate-your-tires to energy independence platform, packed Obama off on vacation in a decidedly sour mood.

There is little doubt that Obama can hardly wait to get to Geneva Switzerland on September 2 to party with George Clooney and other expats indifferent to their carbon footprints.

Before we let the four year senator from Illinois head off into the Pacific sunset, though, we should turn his declaration on America's decline over a few times.

Rather than simply assume that Obama is unable to survive untethered to a teleprompter, we have to at least consider that Obama meant what he said, and that he genuinely believes the country to be not only badly broken, but unmoored from its essential nature: "No longer what it could be. What it once was." It is the sort of critique that cannot be classified with a simple rejection of George Bush and his policies or even of the general conservative direction the country has been moving in since 1968 and especially since 1980.

Obama's verdict --delivered in a few words to a very young American-- is that America has gone radically wrong.

And that it will require radical change.

Perhaps we had an unscripted moment of candor, a declaration from the most radical nominee of a major party in history that he is not about a gentle turning towards the left, or even a major shift in legislative priorities or security policy.

Let's take Obama at his word to a child: If he is elected, Obama sees his job as reshaping America in a fundamental way.

In a radical way.