moreadsense

Please Hit

There are MANY expenses associated with running this site, computers, wifi cards, travel to debates and conferences, purchase of research, etc.

Despite what the progressives say, I receive no funding from the Koch Brothers, Karl Rove, or the Worldwide Jewish Conspiracy.

The only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers.

Folks PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going.

Hit the Tip Jar (it's on the left-hand column).

Monday, March 16, 2009

ABC's Tapper Makes White House Look Stupid Again

ABC's Jake Tapper is one of the few White House Press reporters who have not been swigging down the Presidential cool aid. He asks the questions that we want to know. Take the case of the AIG executive bonuses. Yesterday all hell broke loose when the news began to filter out a about the major green given out to AIG executives because of contractual obligations. Since the federal treasury has been forking over our tax dollars to AIG every few weeks since the first bailout, the questions arises, why didn't anyone know about the contractual bonuses before last week? Jake asked that simple question and White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, seemed as if he was all tied up in his underwear as he tried to answer (which he never does).

Read the transcript below:

March 16, 2009 4:03 PM TAPPER: You guys first found about these bonuses last week?

GIBBS: I think that's true, based on what I read in the newspaper.

TAPPER: But you gave money to AIG two or three weeks ago?

GIBBS: Um-hmm.

TAPPER: How could you not know that they have these millions -- hundreds of millions dollars...

GIBBS: Well, again, there's -- there's -- according to the news reports, there's existing contracts, some of which the -- or of which the president has asked the secretary to examine going forward. I think you also heard the president speak today about having a resolution authority that gives the government and taxpayers far more flexibility in dealing with the disposition of AIG in a way that gives taxpayers protection and flexibility -- disposition that we don't currently have, but steps that we would like to see taken in order to deal with AIG as a whole.

TAPPER: Why didn't you attach it to the $30 billion you gave a couple weeks ago?

GIBBS: Again, Jake, the...

TAPPER: You're looking to retroactively attached it to the new $30 billion.

GIBBS: Well, they're looking through contracts to see what can be done to wrest these bonuses from their recipients.

TAPPER: I'm sorry, just -- I don't understand, so maybe I'm just not understanding, but President Obama said in early February, right when he gave his speech on executive compensation, “these kinds of compensation packages in the midst of this economic crisis isn't just bad taste, it's bad strategy, and I will not tolerate it as president. We're going to be demanding some restraint in exchange for federal aid.” Since that time, he gave tens of billions of dollars in federal aid to AIG without demanding restraint.

GIBBS: Well again, Jake, we've got existing relationships, contracts, as I just mentioned, that were negotiated a year ago, assistance that was granted outside of the legal authority prior to the creation of the troubled asset relief program. The president has asked the administration to go back and look at what remedies are possible to block those bonuses.

TAPPER: But why didn't he do that before?

GIBBS: Well, again, the excessive compensation rules that you'd noted, and I think somebody asked this at the background briefing that we had, obviously are prospective based on some limitations that we have in looking backwards. The president has asked Secretary Geithner and members of the administration to exhaust all legal remedies in looking backwards to see what steps could be taken to block these bonuses.

TAPPER: No, but since -- and I'm sorry to belabor this point -- but since President Obama gave the speech, you guys gave more money to AIG. Why wasn't it attached...

GIBBS: Again, this is...

TAPPER: ... to the new money?

GIBBS: Because it's, again, it's part of the...

TAPPER: Part of the old contracts.

GIBBS: Right. It's part of...

TAPPER: But you're looking to now retroactively see if you can attach something to that old money.

GIBBS: That's what we're looking at.

TAPPER: But why didn't you do it at the time, if you're looking to retroactively do it.

GIBBS: The administration is taking the steps today to go back and see what can be done…to claw those bonuses back

Source

No comments: