The problem is they never read the Hamas "fine print." For example earlier this week, Hamas leader Khaled Meshal told the NY Times that he was willing to recognize Israel and sign a peace that would last 10 years if Israel agreed to the right of return and went back to the pre-June 1967 borders.
Now lets put that into simple language. The Hamas offer says, if Israel moves back to the pre-June 1967 borders and ceases to exist as a Jewish state, we will wait 10 years before attacking. Not a very attractive offer.
In his Column today, Charles Krauthammer called the offer the peace of the grave:
The fact is that Bibi Netanyahu supports a two-state solution. he worked toward one as during his first stint as PM. Bibi is not however, going to publicly agree to a two state solution until he knows what kind of state he is agreeing to. Its as simple as that, as negotiations proceed that announcement will come.
Westerners may be stupid, but Hamas is not. It sees the new American administration making overtures to Iran and Syria. It sees Europe, led by Britain, beginning to accept Hezbollah. It sees itself as next in line. And it knows what to do. Yasser Arafat wrote the playbook.
With the 1993 Oslo accords, he showed what can be achieved with a fake peace treaty with Israel -- universal diplomatic recognition, billions of dollars of aid, and control of Gaza and the West Bank, which Arafat turned into an armed camp. In return for a signature, he created in the Palestinian territories the capacity to carry on the war against Israel that the Arab states had begun in 1948 but had given up after the bloody hell of the 1973 Yom Kippur War.
Meshal sees the opportunity. Not only is the Obama administration reaching out to its erstwhile enemies in the region, but it begins its term by wagging an angry finger at Israel over the Netanyahu government's ostensible refusal to accept a two-state solution.
Of all the phony fights to pick with Israel. No Israeli government would turn down a two-state solution in which the Palestinians accepted territorial compromise and genuine peace with a Jewish state. (And any government that did would be voted out in a day.)
So why does Meshal even make the peace offer? Soccer Dad wrote:
While history doesn't prove that Meshal wasn't making a substantive statement, history certainly suggested that his remarks were superficial posturing so that he'd look good in a West that is too enamored of visions of lambs and lions lying down together that it doesn't pay attention to see if another lamb is fed to lion each new day.But we still don't get it says Professor Barry Rubin on his new blog Rubin Reports:
Meshal isn't a born again peace maker. He's still a terrorist monster. Same as it ever was.
Is it really so hard to see this? Mashal isn’t trying all that hard to conceal his views, ideology, and strategy. In part, that’s because he thinks the people he’s trying to fool are really stupid. In part, it’s because he will have to defend anything he says to his colleagues. In part, too, it is because he is a real true believer (called fanatics in a less enlightened age).
Finally,in this interview Mashal made this statement professing his moderation: “I promise the American administration and the international community that we will be part of the solution, period.”
Unfortunately, the solution he was referring to was Hamas’s final solution for the Jews and Israel.
2 comments:
CAROL HERMAN
Sometimes? Playing with "news" is like playing with dreck. And, sometimes? Even DEBKA supplies accurate tidbits.
It seems when Obama directed "attention must be paid to Turkey" ... what really happened is that the Sunnis. Who sit in power among arabs, got so nervous, the Emirs, etc., all barfed up their lunches.
So, today. DEBKA points out that Turkey actually lost. And, Egypt, et al, grabbed back control of the Mideast "doctrine." And, ya know what? THEY LIKE BIBI! And, they're now terrified of Obama, and his "attempts" to engage the lunatics in Iran.
So far? Except for blogs, the news business is dying. They've lost access to hearts and minds. Bush wasn't the only perveyor of fantasies. Nor was Madoff.
FROM CAROL HERMAN
I know Israelis think American politics is queer. Because you just can't go an elect lots of Jews. While plenty of Americans, Jews included, see Israeli politics as particularly rough. Let alone, what kind of recovery comes after Olmert? And, Livni? Winograd's report didn't make them go away. What will?
As to the media, there ya go, again. Plenty of Americans are very supportive of Israel. (Heck, LBJ and Nixon were both terrified of losing Israel. How come? America's reaction would have been worse that Jimmy Carter's losing Iran.)
As to the "games" ... it's an interesting reshuffle, so far. Turkey, according to DEBKA, just took it on the chin. So the media hype? Hides the truth just the way stage techniques also hide reality, while putting on a show.
Nothing moved the sunni's off their dime! Ah, but now? With fear? And, their own interests at stake? They seem to understand that Israel is an important neighbor. I kid you not.
Even Russia has her fears. Because if you add up all the stuff the arabs bought from Russia, you'd know their battlefield performances were to say it kindly: Under-performers.
So there's tension.
There's also a divide in America; where the GOP is trying the best it can to hold its minority positions without losing even more.
So if you think the media is believable, good for you. Meanwhile, I don't think DEBKA gets things right very often. But when they do? They hit a claim right out of the ballpark.
Oh, in case you didn't know? The UN fears for it's very existence! The money pot is about to get shut down. Not overnight. Not with John Bolton's approach.
But if this were a card game? All the cards that frighten you have been DISPOSED OF. They came out of Obama's hand. And, he's not crazy like Jimmy Carter.
Ten years from now? People may ask how Iran got out from under their zealots?
I don't predict futures. But sometimes, something stink-o ... like iran becoming world class rulers, leaves off the hard evidence.
You can ask: Does it benefit Russia? No. Does it benefit China? No. And, has India, all by herself, moved towards Israel? YES!
Of course, Albert Einstein was once asked: "What future tools will come into play, after there's a nuclear exchange. And, he replied: "Sticks. And, STones.
Post a Comment