Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Friday, June 26, 2009

Conyers: "The Powers that Be" Made Me Back Off ACORN"

At the end of March there was some hope, after hearing testimony regarding the systematic pattern of voter fraud by ACORN,  Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) called for a probe of the Democrat's favorite voting fraud group. Admittedly his call for an investigation was shocking because of the fraud testimony indicated a relationship with the Obama campaign.

 ACORN as been accused of voter registration fraud in 15 states. And since Conyers first made his declaration, indictments have been brought in Nevada and Pennsylvania, so why did Conyers changed his mind about a Congressional Investigation? Well according to the Congressman, he was forced to give up the fight by "The Powers that Be," implying that senior party members stepped in to protect the democratic party associated criminal enterprise:

Conyers backs off probe of ACORN

S.A. Miller


House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. has backed off his plan to investigate purported wrongdoing by the liberal activist group ACORN, saying ?powers that be? put the kibosh on the idea.

Mr. Conyers, Michigan Democrat, earlier bucked his party leaders by calling for hearings on accusations the Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) has committed crimes ranging from voter fraud to a mob-style "protection" racket.

"The powers that be decided against it," Mr. Conyers told The Washington Times as he left the House chambers Wednesday.

The chairman declined to elaborate, shrugging off questions about who told him how to run his committee and give the Democrat-allied group a pass.

Conyers spokesman Jonathan Godfrey said late Thursday, several hours after the first request for comment, that the chairman had been referring to himself as "the powers that be."

Pittsburgh lawyer Heather Heidelbaugh, whose testimony about ACORN at a March 19 hearing on voting issues prompted Mr. Conyers to call for a probe, said she was perplexed by Mr. Conyers' explanation for his change of heart.

"If the chair of the Judiciary Committee cannot hold a hearing if he wants to, [then] who are the powers that he is beholden to?" she said. "Is it the leadership, is it the White House, is it contributors? Who is 'the power'?"

The comment spurred similar questions by House Republicans, who asked whether House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was involved in blocking the probe.

"Chairman Conyers has a responsibility to explain who is blocking this investigation, and why. Is it Speaker Pelosi? Others in the Democratic leadership? Who in Congress is covering up ACORN's corruption?" said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican.

Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. of Wisconsin, ranking Republican on the Judiciary subcommittee on the Constitution, civil rights and civil liberties, said the chairman should be calling the shots.

}Mr. Conyers, who heard the allegations against ACORN, was sufficiently impressed to realize a future hearing was needed to thoroughly investigate the matter," he said. "It's unfortunate that people who didn't hear the testimony are making the decisions. The Democratic leadership should step up to disclose who instructed Mr. Conyers to drop his plan."

The office of Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, did not respond to questions about Mr. Conyers' comments.

Capitol Hill had bristled at the prospect of hearings because it threatened to rekindle criticism of the financial ties and close cooperation between President Obama's campaign and ACORN and its sister organizations Citizens Services Inc. and Project Vote.

The groups came under fire during the campaign after probes into suspected voter fraud in a series of presidential battleground states, including Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Mexico and Nevada.

ACORN and its affiliates are currently the target of at least 14 lawsuits related to voter fraud in the 2008 election and a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act complaint filed by former ACORN members.

The group's leaders have consistently denied any wrongdoing and previously said they welcomed a congressional probe.

The group did not respond to questions about Mr. Conyers being convinced to drop those plans.

Ms. Heidelbaugh, who spearheaded an unsuccessful lawsuit last year to stop ACORN's Pennsylvania voter-registration drive, testified in March that the nonprofit group was violating tax, campaign-finance and other laws by, among other things, sharing with the Barack Obama campaign a list of the Democrat's maxed-out campaign donors so ACORN could use it to solicit them for a get-out-the-vote drive.

ACORN also provided liberal causes with protest-for-hire services and coerced donations from targets of demonstrations through a shakedown it called the "muscle for the money" program, said Ms. Heidelbaugh, a member of the executive board of the Republican National Lawyers Association.

Mr. Conyers, a fierce partisan known for his drive to continue investigating President George W. Bush's administration, had been an unlikely champion for opponents of ACORN.

Before calling for the probe, he frequently defended ACORN. In October, he condemned an FBI voter-fraud investigation targeting the group, questioning whether it was politically motivated to hamper a voter-registration likely to turn out supporters for Mr. Obama's candidacy.

But in March, Mr. Conyers dismissed the argument made by fellow Democrats that accusations of voter fraud and other crimes should be explored by prosecutors and decided in court, not by lawmakers in Congress.

"That's our jurisdiction, the Department of Justice," Mr. Conyers said in March. "That's what we handle voter fraud. Unless that's been taken out of my jurisdiction and I didn't know it."

1 comment:

Carol_Herman said...

FROM CAROL HERMAN

There used to be an expression "Slow News Day." That dealt with the periods of time most journalists took off for vacation. And, a "ghost staff" was left in place. Where the news didn't travel into the same windy cycles.

Later, on 9/11, again from the old media, you heard the expression "if you have bad news push it out the door, today." (Because the world got caught up watching the 9/11 events, full time.)

Today, just as Governor Sanford appears relieved that the KING IS DEAD, Michael Jackson's passing has sucked the air out of all the other news. Including the G8 dancers. And, other UN types. Who still can't bring themselves to condemn, properly, the deaths of innocent people in the streets of Iran.

You think Obama is winning? I think he and his teleprompter have taken a very great fall. (Humpty Dumpty?) Only if children's morality tales hold together for reasons of truth.)

For Bibi, the air got sucked out of Obama's plans to pressure Isreal. Even the one where the IDF is supposedly "leaving Dayton's American men" in charge of 4 big Palestinian towns in the West Bank. Maybe, you've seen this on paper? Maybe, it's on fly paper? But things can happen now below the radar screen. And, for Bibi this is a good thing.

In America, as I said, there's a mess going on. The bus isn't big enough to put the entire political system under its wheels.

And, long before Israel needs to worry about Obama's stick; Obama should worry that "doing these things" didn't help Jimmy Carter.

Don't confuse Jimmy Carter's trips as a sign that he's popular.

On the other hand? The media is dying probably for the same reasons Michael Jackson is dead. To lessen the pain they are big time users of pain killers. Hearts and minds don't thrive on such stuff.

Suck in your breath. Don't let Obama play games. And, as my son would say: CHANGE THE SUBJECT. Talk about cute kittens.