Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Sunday, September 20, 2009

When is a Tax Not a Tax? When Obama Says It Isn't




According to Webster's on-line Dictionary a Tax is a Charge against a citizen's person or property or activity for the support of government.
 
According to President Obama, a Tax is anything he says it is (or isn't).

Today the President did his tour of the Sunday News shows of all of the networks that show a bias toward Obama and his policies (meaning everyone but Fox).  Most of the discussions were as lame as you would expect them to be, with one exception, George Stephanopoulos went off script and asked one tough question.

In the Senator Baucus version of the Obamacare bill there is a provision which says that anyone who does not hold insurance will have to pay $3,800 to the government. Stephanopoulos called that a tax increase, Obama says no way:

Obama's Nontax Tax On a Sunday show, the President offers a revealing definition.


President Obama didn't make much news on his round of five Sunday talk shows yesterday, with one notable exception. The President revealed a great deal about his philosophy of government and how he defines a tax increase. It turns out the President thinks a health-care tax is not a tax if he thinks the tax is for your own good.


Appearing on ABC's "This Week," Mr. Obama was asked by host George Stephanopoulos about the "individual mandate." Under Max Baucus's Senate bill that Mr. Obama supports, everyone would be required to buy health insurance or else pay a penalty as high as $3,800 a year. Mr. Stephanopoulos posed the obvious question about this kind of coercion when "the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don't [buy insurance]. . . . How is that not a tax?"


"Well, hold on a second, George," Mr. Obama replied. "Here's what's happening. You and I are both paying $900, on average—our families—in higher premiums because of uncompensated care. Now what I've said is that if you can't afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn't be punished for that. That's just piling on. If, on the other hand, we're giving tax credits, we've set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we've driven down the costs, we've done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you've just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care, that's . . ."


"That may be," Mr. Stephanopoulos responded, "but it's still a tax increase." (In fact, uncompensated care accounts for about only 2.2% of national health spending today, but that's another subject.)


Mr. Obama: "No. That's not true, George. The—for us to say that you've got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it's saying is, is that we're not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore . . ." In other words, like parents talking to their children, this levy—don't call it a tax—is for your own good.


Mr. Stephanopoulos tried again: "But it may be fair, it may be good public policy—"


Mr. Obama: "No, but—but, George, you—you can't just make up that language and decide that that's called a tax increase."


"I don't think I'm making it up," Mr. Stephanopoulos said. He then had the temerity to challenge the Philologist in Chief, with an assist from Merriam-Webster. He cited that dictionary's definition of "tax"—"a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes."


Mr. Obama: "George, the fact that you looked up Merriam's Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you're stretching a little bit right now. . . ."


Mr. Stephanopoulos: "I wanted to check for myself. But your critics say it is a tax increase."


Mr. Obama: "My critics say everything is a tax increase. My critics say that I'm taking over every sector of the economy. You know that. Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we're going to have an individual mandate or not, but . . ."


Mr. Stephanopoulos: "But you reject that it's a tax increase?"


Mr. Obama: "I absolutely reject that notion."


If you can follow this reasoning, then you probably also think that a new entitlement is the best way to reduce entitlement spending. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the Senate's individual mandate will result in new revenues of some $20 billion over 10 years because some people will choose to opt out of ObamaCare—or because they can't afford to buy in, given that other taxes and regulation will make health care more expensive. If that $20 billion doesn't count as tax revenue, then what is it?


And for that matter, what doesn't count as a nontax under Mr. Obama's definition? All taxes can be justified in the name of providing some type of service, however wasteful. Mr. Obama complains that "My critics say everything is a tax increase," as if that is his political problem. His real problem is that the individual mandate really is a tax, but the President doesn't want voters to think of it that way, because taxes are unpopular.
Of course it is not a tax increase, the POTUS wants us to call it a charge that is all the fault of Fox News and right wing bloggers.Don't be surprised if George Stephanopoulos is placed on the sidelines during the next time the President does a Sunday tour of his in-house news organizations.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Obama is a sick sick man and it's amazing to see George even stand up to him like that. They getting ballsy over there?