For those people, I have good news, you can take off the purple sneakers and come out. To paraphrase "Honest Abe," One Score of years ago our fathers looked at the thermometer and the temperature was the same as it was today." And the scientists who are perpetuating the global warming hoax don't understand why!! (of course they neglect the obvious that their climate models were/are WRONG)
DEBATE about the reality of a two-decade pause in global warming and what it means has made its way from the sceptical fringe to the mainstream.
In a lengthy article this week, The Economist magazine said if climate scientists were credit-rating agencies, then climate sensitivity - the way climate reacts to changes in carbon-dioxide levels - would be on negative watch but not yet downgraded.
Another paper published by leading climate scientist James Hansen, the head of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, says the lower than expected temperature rise between 2000 and the present could be explained by increased emissions from burning coal.Sure--- and eating more Ice Cream will cure my diabetes.
For Hansen the pause is a fact, but it's good news that probably won't last.Last October one of the leading advocates of climate change/global warming (or whatever they call it on Wednesday) announced that world-wide temperatures haven't changed for 16 years;
International Panel on Climate Change chairman Rajendra Pachauri recently told The Weekend Australian the hiatus would have to last 30 to 40 years "at least" to break the long-term warming trend.
The Met office in the UK which is one of the key proponents of the Climate Change hoax in the world, now says global warming stopped over 15 years ago. That is that the average temperature between 1997 and August 2012 did not rise at all. Although they didn't want people to know it as they released the numbers onto the internet without any fanfare (six months ago when they had numbers that supported the climate change theory the Met office made a major "press announcement."The last time the temperature rose, Al Gore's Chakra was working for Bill Clinton...that was way before his Oscar-winning movie and his investment company which "coincidentally" is poised to make billions of dollars off of the global warming scare.
Those figures went up to 2010 - supposedly the hottest year on record - and showed a continuing warming trend.To put this no warming period in perspective, before 1980 temperatures were stable or even declining. Scientists were predicting another ice age. That was followed by a period of warming from 1980-1996. Now the world-wide temperatures have stabilized for as long a period as the warming which, when looked at objectively may mean the warming period was simply an aberration.
But the fact that global surface temperatures have not followed the expected global warming pattern is now widely accepted.
Research by Ed Hawkins of University of Reading shows surface temperatures since 2005 are already at the low end of the range projections derived from 20 climate models and if they remain flat, they will fall outside the models' range within a few years.In other words man made computer models with elements created by man, are not matching real-life climate with elements created by God. Anyone surprised?
"The global temperature standstill shows that climate models are diverging from observations," says David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.
"If we have not passed it already, we are on the threshold of global observations becoming incompatible with the consensus theory of climate change," he says.
Don't worry the Global warming scientists say despite the fact that it hasn't warmed for longer than it did their climate models swear its going to get warmer...if not today...some day..they promise..and really mean it this time!
3 comments:
The Dr. Peter Venkman touch was excellent! Been moved to use it several times recently :)
Environmental Progressives are progressively being blinded to... well every 'obviousity' on the planet and proving God's Word every step of the way.
(just read Romans 1:18-32)
Your graph is seriously biased by choosing 1997 as the starting year, one that was exceedingly hot. If you want a more balanced view of the data, look at NASA.
Watch out, Al Gore might be canonized by the new Pope.
Post a Comment