Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Thursday, June 27, 2013

IRS IG's Response- The IRS Did NOT Target/Delay Progressive Applications (Only Conservative)

Sorry Progressives
Earlier this week the IRS released  disclosure yesterday of 15 redacted versions of its Be On the Lookout document, or BOLO, in an attempt to prove that their contention that the delays experienced by Tea Party groups applying for nonprofit status were a symptom of mismanagement and not politically motivated action.

The Progressive world had a field day, "see" they said, "the IRS Scandal was not political just stupid"

Rep. Sander Levin maintained at yesterday's the "failure" of the IG report to originally disclose this was a "fundamental flaw" in their investigation. He said it "contributed to the distortion of the entire investigation."

Democrats argued that by leaving out the detail on progressive groups, it gave Republicans license to cast the scandal as politically motivated.
"Half of the story has been told for I think for a very political reason and that is to make conservative groups feel as though they are the only ones receiving this heightened scrutiny and treatment and that somehow it must be orchestrated by the White House," Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-Calif., said. "And we believe that that's completely false."
Rep. Levin  demanded that the IRS inspector general, J. Russell George, should explain why his May 14 report didn’t include this information and demanded to know why the progressive organizations targeted by the IRS weren't included in his report.

Yesterday Inspector General George wrote Levin a letter which provided the answers which were sure to ruin most progressives weekends.
"Our audit did not find evidence that the IRS used the "Progressives" identifier as selection criteria for potential political cases between May 2010 and May 2012. The focus of our audit was on whether the IRS: 1) targeted specific groups applying for tax-exempt status, 2) delayed processing of targeted groups' applications, and 3) requested unnecessary information from targeted groups. We determined the IRS developed and used inappropriate criteria to identify applications from organizations with the words Tea Party in their names."
In other words, the Internal Revenue Service confined their witch-hunt to conservative and pro-Israeli organizations. Apparently the term "progressives" appeared in a section of the BOLO spreadsheet labeled "Historical," and, unlike other BOLO entries, did not include instructions on how to handle cases that met the "progressive" criteria.

According to the AG, the numbers don't lie:
"Based on the information you flagged regarding the existence of a 'Progressives' entry on BOLO lists, TIGTA performed additional research which determined that six tax-exempt applications filed between May 2010 and May 2012 having the words "progress" or "progressive" in their names were included in the 298 cases the IRS identified as potential political cases. We also determined that 14 tax-exempt applications filed between May 2010 and May 2012 using the words "progress" or "progressive" in their names were not referred for added scrutiny as potential political cases. In total, 30 percent of the organizations we identified with the words "progress" or "progressive" in their names were processed as potential political cases.

"In comparison, our audit found that 100 percent of the tax-exempt applications with Tea Party, Patriots, or 9/12 in their names were processed as potential political cases during the timeframe of our audit."
Sorry Liberals, you can chill now because the evidence shows us that conservative groups were not only flagged, but targeted and abused by the IRS.  Progressive groups were flagged, but the flagging was not followed up by anyone in the IRS.


Lori Lowenthal Marcus said...

I knew it! I knew that was a face-saving spreadsheet used to distract attention and make it look as though the IRS was an equal opportunity offender. But they stupidly provided the evidence that they were indeed targeting Z STREET for our viewpoint - thus proving they acted unconstitutionally in their treatment of our application for 501(c)(3) status.

OB1 said...

The term for this sort of behavior is Political Bigotry directed against Conservatives. It's basically the same as Racial Bigotry directed at Blacks a few decades ago -- Conservatives are stupid, can't take care of themselves, don't know a thing about nothing, and more -- or so the mantra goes.

The Racial Bigotry that was laced into Southern Democrats in the past has been embraced as Political Bigotry by contemporary Democrats, Burrocrats and Public unions. Plus, without any discriminatory prohibition against acting on their (Political) Bigotry, spreading it and promoting it becomes a way of life.

The GOP LOSERship might speak up against the practice, except that they also benefit as silent partners in this charade. Conservatives would challenge the LOSERships powerbase -- so silence is golden.

It's all good, nothing to see here, just move along.