Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Thursday, February 6, 2014

Why is April 2013 Attack on Calif. Power Substation First Being Exposed Now?


What if there was a terrorist attack but no one told us? What if that terrorist attack exposed the vulnerability of the entire U.S. power grid?

An April 16, 2013, attack had been virtually unreported until the The Wall Street Journal reported it yesterday. It started when someone (or some ones) entered an underground vault to cut telephone cables, and then fired more than 100 shots into PG&E's Metcalf transmission substation (near San Jose) knocking out 17 transformers. Electric officials were able to avert a blackout, but it took 27 days to repair the damage.

The attack was "the most significant incident of domestic terrorism involving the grid that has ever occurred" in the U.S., said Jon Wellinghoff, who was chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at the time.

Wellinghoff who stepped down in November, apparently gave high-level briefings to federal agencies, Congress and the White House last year. But because nothing has happened to capture the perpetrators or better safeguard the power grid, he went public with it now.

The FBI says they don't think it's terrorism but:

Some people in the utility industry share Mr. Wellinghoff's concerns, including a former official at PG&E, Metcalf's owner, who told an industry gathering in November he feared the incident could have been a dress rehearsal for a larger event.

"This wasn't an incident where Billy-Bob and Joe decided, after a few brewskis, to come in and shoot up a substation," Mark Johnson, retired vice president of transmission for PG&E, told the utility security conference, according to a video of his presentation. "This was an event that was well thought out, well planned and they targeted certain components." When reached, Mr. Johnson declined to comment further.

A spokesman for PG&E said the company takes all incidents seriously but declined to discuss the Metcalf event in detail for fear of giving information to potential copycats. "We won't speculate about the motives" of the attackers, added the spokesman, Brian Swanson. He said PG&E has increased security measures.
Here is the frightening part.
Many of the system's most important components sit out in the open, often in remote locations, protected by little more than cameras and chain-link fences.

Transmission substations are critical links in the grid. They make it possible for electricity to move long distances, and serve as hubs for intersecting power lines.
The "guts" of each substation are transformers which, increase or decrease the voltage of the electricity depending on whether it is has to travel hundreds of miles along high-voltage lines to other parts of the country or is approaching its destination.
The country's roughly 2,000 very large transformers are expensive to build, often costing millions of dollars each, and hard to replace. Each is custom made and weighs up to 500,000 pounds, and "I can only build 10 units a month," said Dennis Blake, general manager of Pennsylvania Transformer in Pittsburgh, one of seven U.S. manufacturers. The utility industry keeps some spares on hand.
In other words if there is a major attack it will take months to bring the entire grid back on line.
A 2009 Energy Department report said that "physical damage of certain system components (e.g. extra-high-voltage transformers) on a large scale…could result in prolonged outages, as procurement cycles for these components range from months to years."

Mr. Wellinghoff said a FERC analysis found that if a surprisingly small number of U.S. substations were knocked out at once, that could destabilize the system enough to cause a blackout that could encompass most of the U.S.
The WSJ piece raises many red flags. The attack on the San Jose substation wasn't kept a secret, but wasn't widely reported either, why wasn't the public alerted to keep their eyes open?

The FBI says the incident is still being investigated so they won't label it as terrorism. It happened almost ten months ago, why can't they draw a line on who perpetuated the attack an their motivation? On the other hand like the shooting at Ft. Hood, or the attack on our Benghazi mission, is the administration refusing to call it a terrorist attack in an effort to hide its impotence in the War on Terror?

Finally, what if anything has been done to protect the elements of our power grid since April? Why isn't protecting the power grid a priority? Just think about how months-long power interruption would destroy the economy.

8 comments:

Jeff Dunetz said...

Ref: "The FBI says they don't think it's terrorism..."
With guns ablazing at multiple targets in one compound...what was it, some schoolyard prank...gimmee a break!
As Hillary Clinton would say, "At this point in time what difference does it make."

Jeff Dunetz said...

Best case scenario: someone desperately wanted the vulnerability of our power grid made public.


Worst case scenario: Our enemies are getting ready.

Jeff Dunetz said...

It must have been a video

Jeff Dunetz said...

Actually, the incidenct was widely reported by Bay Area media when it occurred, but seemed minor to nationwide media. Now that terrorism is suspected everyone has taken an interest. PG&E still refuses to label it as terrorism. PG&E is a bloated, inept, bureaucratic monstrosity that has been feeding off the public for decades. The San Bruno pipeline explosion in 2010 brought to light the utility's lax record keeping and lack of control over their assets. They're trying to avoid more bad press and additional expense(to remediate the situation). Meh... so a few dozen customers get fried in an explosion, so the power grid might fail... at least the bureaucrats are still getting their paychecks.

Jeff Dunetz said...

No, this was covered back in April as vandalism and sabotage by CBS S.F., the San Jose Mercury news and others. Heck, I even posted on this item on my Facebook account a couple months ago.

What we really need to worry about it the fact that, unless a national publication makes a story out of something like this, it gets ignored. The power of the mainstream press (yes, the WSJ is a member of that group) to excite, engage and direct the conversation is excessive and worrisome. In this day of the Internet, 24/7 news and your ability to source stories from all over the world, this took the WSJ to get people to notice. Perhaps that is at least as important as the terrorist attack on the substation?

Jeff Dunetz said...

Don't you just love to hear the FBI state, "Yes, we have known of this for some time because we have had them under observation for months". Kinda makes a person feel secure, huh.

Jeff Dunetz said...

According to the timeline, the attackers rampaged for 19 minutes, and then ONE MINUTE before the cops arrived the gunmen escaped. Their timing was rather impeccable, wouldn't you say?


Furthermore, how did they escape? How many people are on the road at 2:00 a.m.? Seems pretty amazing they were able to make their escape so easily and unhindered.

Jeff Dunetz said...

Don't worry. DHS is busy arresting people for selling NFL knockoff t-shirts. We're in good hands.