Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Jimmy Carter Promotes Hamas Because He Hates The Jews



Today America's worst ex-president Jimmy Carter demanded recognition of Hamas’ “legitimacy as a political actor”. The president who created the Islamist republic of Iran and the Taliban's demand was not surprising after all the peanut president hates Israel. He hates Israel because he hates Jews.

I try not to use the term anti-Semite often. But I know of no other term (except maybe buffoon) to describe the peanut president.

Take for example, a look at Carter's book, “Palestine Peace Not Apartheid” Referring to U.S. policy and the “condoning” of Israel’s actions, Carter says:
There are constant and vehement political and media debates in Israel concerning its policies in the West Bank but because of powerful political, economic, and religious forces in the U.S., Israeli government decisions are rarely questioned or condemned, voices from Jerusalem dominate our media, and most American citizens are unaware of circumstances in the occupied territories.
In English, Carter is using that ugly old anti-Semitic stereotype that the Jews control the media, Congress, and the U.S. Foreign policy. If Carter thought about it--if the Jews really did control the media would they let him appear on TV?

Ambassador Marc Ginsburg was Jimmy Carter's deputy senior adviser on the Middle East, and from 1977 through 1980 was White House liaison to the State Department. He has a unique perspective of Jimmy Carter's Middle East dealings. According to the Ambassador, the reason that the Peanut President goes out of his way to bash Israel is that he feels American Jews did not kiss his butt enough for all that he did for Israel.
...When former President Jimmy Carter revealed that Israel has more than 150 nuclear weapons, he clearly had a motive, according to his administration’s deputy senior adviser, Marc Ginsberg: “I think there’s no doubt — particularly given the vantage point I had in the White House at the end of his administration — that he resents the way in which Israel and the American-Jewish community have failed to express sufficient gratitude for his efforts on behalf of peace in the Middle East.
There’s no doubt he knows exactly what he is doing when he’s making these statements, or making misrepresentations that Hamas has agreed to recognize Israel if certain conditions occur, or to the book he wrote [‘Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid’] referring to Israel.
 Alan Dershowitz also feels that Carter is a Jew Hater:
The entire premise of his criticism of Jewish influence on American foreign policy is that money talks. It is Carter, not me, who has made the point that if politicians receive money from Jewish sources, then they are not free to decide issues regarding the Middle East for themselves. It is Carter, not me, who has argued that distinguished reporters cannot honestly report on the Middle East because they are being paid by Jewish money. So, by Carter's own standards, it would be almost economically "suicidal" for Carter "to espouse a balanced position between Israel and Palestine."

....If money determines political and public views as Carter insists "Jewish money" does, Carter's views on the Middle East must be deemed to have been influenced by the vast sums of Arab money he has received. If he who pays the piper calls the tune, then Carter's off-key tunes have been called by his Saudi Arabian paymasters. It pains me to say this, but I now believe that there is no person in American public life today who has a lower ratio of real to apparent integrity than Jimmy Carter. The public perception of his integrity is extraordinarily high. His real integrity, it now turns out, is extraordinarily low. He is no better than so many former American politicians who, after leaving public life, sell themselves to the highest bidder and become lobbyists for despicable causes. That is now Jimmy Carter's sad legacy.
Carter even rejected someone for a position on the board of the Holocaust Memorial Council because the guy's name was too Jewish:

Former President Jimmy Carter once complained there were "too many Jews" on the government's Holocaust Memorial Council, Monroe Freedman, the council's former executive director, told WND in an exclusive interview.

Freedman, who served on the council during Carter's term as president, also revealed a noted Holocaust scholar who was a Presbyterian Christian was rejected from the council's board by Carter's office because the scholar's name "sounded too Jewish."

Freedman says he was tasked with creating a board for the council and with making recommendations to the White House on how best to memorialize the Holocaust.

He told WND he sent a memo to Carter's office containing recommendations for council board members.

He said his memo was returned with a note on the upper right hand corner that stated, "Too many Jews." The note, Freedman said, was written in Carter's handwriting and was initialed by Carter. 
It's really simple...almost as simple as Carter---he promotes Hamas because he hates Israel---and Carter hates Israel because he hates Jews.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

And Obama is the same, right?

Unknown said...

Carter is worse because he voluntarily hates Jews. As a Muslim, Obama was reared in Jew hatred so his hatred is involuntary. Obama is far more dangerous because unlike Carter who is a buffoon and a mental midget, Obama has a few functioning brain cells. Luckily for all of us, Obama is lazy so he is doing less damage than he could were he a full-time President rather than a full-time vacationer and campaigner-in-chief. Obama's other strength is his ability with just an annoying inflection of his voice to convince his ignorant base that whatever he says is gospel no matter how absurd.