Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

The 68 Congressional Members Who Were Briefed On Enhanced Interrogation From 2001-2007

While the media coverage of the Feinstein report is talking about what the "evil CIA" may have done to some prisoners and whether or not the information extracted from those prisoners was actionable, missing is a discussion of when the congress was briefed about the techniques used. To paraphrase a line from Howard Baker during the "Watergate Hearings," America wants to know, "What did Congress know and when did they know it?"

Understand the purpose of this post is not to argue which interrogation was or wasn't torture, that will be handled in a later post, the purpose of this post is to point out the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party congressional members who sat in meetings with the CIA, being briefed on enhanced interrogation, and now 9-12 years after being briefed are mendaciously claiming surprise and horror. 

That information has been available for almost five years. In Feb. 2010 via a FIOA  lawsuit, Judicial Watch received a report created by the CIA during the Bush presidency (in 2007) detailing which members of congress were briefed and what were they briefed on.

The report (embedded below) shows that the CIA briefed at least 68 members of Congress on the CIA interrogation program, including "enhanced interrogation techniques" (EITs) . It details the dates of all congressional briefings and in most cases, the members of Congress in attendance and the specific subjects discussed. Keep in mind though, that the topic for each one of these meetings was interrogation of prisoners.

For example in April 2002 both the House (HPSCI)  and Senate (SSCI) committees on intelligence were briefed on the "Ongoing Interrogations of Abu Zubaydah, who was mentioned in the Feinstein report. According to the report, at this time EITs were referenced but there is no evidence they were discussed in detail. However later meetings not only discussed but gave examples of EITs being used, (but attendees weren't mentioned). Finally near the end of 2002 we see that the most Senior members of the House and Senate committees had meetings totally devoted to EITs.




During the Summer of 2003 additional members of Congress were had meetings devoted to EITs, including Senator Rockefeller who yesterday claimed on the Senate floor, "To be perfectly clear, these harsh techniques were not approved by anyone – ever – for the low-bar standard of learning ‘useful information' from detainees.”





At least through 2005, generally the meetings included the full committee on the House side and the Senior person from each party on the Senate committee. However, there are many meetings during this period where attendees and subject of meeting were not provided, but again each of the meetings on this particular chart deals with interrogation.

In 2006 on the ides of March is the first appearance of Diane Feinstein who eventually became Chairman of the committee.

For America to believe that these Congressional members sat through meetings which were entirely about EITs or the other meetings whose purpose is redacted in this 2007 report, knew none of the details mentioned in the Feinstein report, we would have to be as stupid and gullible as Obamacare architect consultant Jonathan Gruber claims we are.

Whether or not you believe that techniques such as water boarding is torture or not does not change the duplicitous of the Feinstein's Democratic Party action.

The full document is embedded below.


CIA Interrogation Briefings 02232010 by Jeffrey Dunetz

2 comments:

Jeff Dunetz said...

Democrats are not interested in the truth, otherwise they would have interviewed some of the interrogators. They are only interested in the end result, no matter if they have to lie, steal, or cheat to get there. And they probably wouldn't even recognize the truth if it smacked them in the face. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor....

Jeff Dunetz said...

The level of hypocrisy has jammed the meter's needle up against the peg and wrapped it around it.

These hyperventilating, panties-in-a-wad harpies (female, male, and ???) are the same slime balls (alternately, slime-without-balls) who were BRIEFED many times on what was planned and done, as well as wondering if there wasn't more that could be done.

These now-incredulous (golly gee, we never would have guessed) geniuses let the dogs off the leash, loudly commanded, "Sic 'em!" and then jumped up and down, pom poms waving, while they gleefully cheered, "Go team, go! Fight, team, fight!"

Now they're collectively on the fainting couch (getting a tad crowded there, it is), ready to throw under the bus those out on the pointy end of the spear who did their expressed bidding.

As they cry out for punishment for the "doers" of all this "evil" and those at the CIA who gave the orders, they conveniently ignore that it was they, themselves, who ordered the CIA to march forward. If the "foot soldiers" just "carrying out orders" are to be indicted, how about the ultimate order-givers? Does Nuremberg ring a bell?