Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

A Jew And A Catholic Were Invited To Congress, The Jew Was Treated Differently By The Dems And The Media

A Jew and a Catholic went to Congress kind of sounds like the beginning of a joke, but it is what will be played out over the next few months. The Jew of course is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Catholic Pope Frances. Each was invited to speak under the same circumstances, but the reaction to the invitations was totally different.

Speaker Boehner invited two people to speak to a joint session of congress. The speaker didn't check with the President before making either invitation (nor did he have to). Each of the two speakers has something important to say to the members of congress.

The Premier of the Jewish State didn't accept the invitation until the President was informed he was roundly criticized for accepting. The head of the Catholic Church was invited and when he accepted no one asked if the President knew...everyone just cheered.

Only the Jewish man's visit was criticized. I am not saying his visit was bashed only because he is Jewish---I'm just pointing out a fact.

As of this writing all of these Progressives are refusing to listen to the Jew speak; Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Representative Luis Gutierrez of Illinois, Representative John Lewis of Georgia, Representative Earl Blumenauer of Oregon, Representative G. K. Butterfield of North Carolina, Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina, Representative Raúl Grijalva of Arizona, and Vice President Joe Biden. Not one of these Democrats (and one Socialist) is refusing to listen to the Catholic speak.

Just because they will show up for the Pope plan and not for the Jew, it doesn't mean they made they made the decision based on religion. I am just pointing out what is happening.

The mainstream media is still saying the President didn’t know the Prime Minister was invited to speak, but the NY Times says Obama was informed before the Jewish man said yes.. On the day the head of the Catholic Church accepted the invitation the President didn't call it a breach of protocol even though he wasn’t consulted, in fact he said he was eager to welcome the pope to the U.S. "Like so many people around the world, I've been touched by his call to relieve suffering, and to show justice and mercy and compassion to the most vulnerable."

The President says the breach of protocol was that the Jewish man is running for re-election and voting day is soon. But the president sent his Vice President and Secretary of State to meet with the man running against the Jewish Prime Minister.

It was strange that the President praised the leader of the Catholic Church but called the Jewish leader's acceptance of an invitation a breach of protocol. I am not saying the Jew's visit was a breach of protocol only because of his faith; I'm just pointing out fact.

A few months ago the President blasted the same Premier of the Jewish State for allowing Jews to purchase homes in certain areas of Jerusalem. It was a very unique criticism. That President had never criticized people of any other faith for buying homes in any other spot in the world.

Now I am not saying the President hated the home sale because the buyers were Jewish---I'm just pointing out a fact.

On Thursday, Nancy Pelosi said that many members of her caucus would be too busy to show up when the Prime Minister of the Jewish State spoke before Congress. "I don't think anybody should use the word 'boycott,'" Pelosi said. "When these heads of state come, people are here doing their work, they're trying to pass legislation, and they’re meeting with their constituents and the rest. It's not a high-priority item for them." Just a few hours earlier when she heard that the leader of the Catholic Church was going to speak before congress Pelosi said in a written statement that she looks forward to "hearing his call to live our values, to protect the poor and the needy, and to promote peace."

Why was Pelosi's reaction different for the Jew and the Catholic? I am not saying it had anything to do with the Jew's faith; I'm just pointing out the difference.

Essentially both leaders will be delivering a message about how we should be treating each other. The Pope is going to Congress to deliver a message of peace; his teachings are usually about how mankind should be nicer to each other no matter who they are. He speaks of a Savior who saves souls. The Jewish Premier is going to congress to talk about preventing one evil nation from creating a super weapon to kill millions of people, both in his country and in this country. People of both parties share his opinion.

One of the speakers is talking about saving souls; the other is talking about saving lives. But only the Jew's message is criticized in the mainstream media as a "slap" at the President. I am not saying its because he is Jewish, I am just point out a fact.

Two leaders invited to speak before a joint session of Congress, both were invited without first asking the White House, the president was aware of the invitations before each was accepted. Each of the leaders were close friends of the United States, each will deliver an important message designed to make this world a better place. But only the Pope is being welcomed.

I am not saying the Prime Minister visit is being criticized because he is Jewish and he leads the only Jewish country in the world, a country which is threatened by terrorists and by Iranian nuclear weapons, there must be a more logical reason---I just can't think of one right now.

BTW for those of you who believe my argument to be "over the top," I say rubbish! If I can be called racist every time I have disagreed with this President over past six years, people who are making these bogus claims about Netanyahu's visit especially member of the CDC who are making an organized effort to boycott Bibi's speech must be motivated by Antisemitism.


Unknown said...

The parallel is interesting, but the real reason they are being treated differently is that Obama isn't trying to directly undermine the Pope's re-election efforts.

Unknown said...

The pope is also a leftist, to put it nicely.

Unknown said...

Obama is pouting, stomping his foot and cry foul...The Dems are trying to cheer him up by not respecting BiBl. Awww poor Obama, he is defective in mind and soul. No amount of boycotting this honorable man (BiBi) will make a difference to the American people. WE Love, Respect and PRAY for you BiBi. Amen

Unknown said...

Amen! Well said. I so agree with all you have written.

Unknown said...

Dems are so comfortable with being hypocrites they're not even trying to pretend they're not any more.

Unknown said...

Of course they were treated differently. The pope is not interested in putting his political career ahead of the interest of his constituents. Must Americans do not realize Likud does not equal the state of Israel. Likud is just one of many parties. And before any republicans start crying a anti-semitism they should think which political party is on its way to becoming Judenfrei in the house and senate. Let's not kid ourselves the republucan party is no longer politically disposed towards electing jewish candidates outside of Bew York. Jewish representation in Congress droped but still significant. Of the 535 members of Congress, 28 are Jewish. Of the 301 Republicans in Congress only one is Jewish. How long will the charade last that the GOP is the party of security for israel when they will not even vote for jews. If Likud should lose the upcoming election and not form the next government I suspect the " Christian Grand Old Party" will not have much use for Israel or Jews and will drop them like a hot potato. For now I will stick with the party that represents jews and not the party that tolerates us.