Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Clinton's Church Publishes Anti-Israel Books

We have spend lots of time criticizing Senator Obama for not publicly rebuking the Anti-Israel stance of his Church. It would not be fair to make the same demand from the other Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton. Her Church, the United Methodist Church also has a worrisome track record to those who support Israel.

The United Methodist Church has never been a big fan of Israel. Take for example last July, Rev. Randy R. Day, chief executive of the General Board of Global Ministries for the United Methodist Church, issued a statement that said: "Neither the attacks of Hezbollah on Israel or the Israeli military actions in Gaza and Lebanon can be justified from the perspective of international law or sound political policy."

In other words the Rev drew a moral equivalence between Israel’s defensive behavior and the behavior of those who seek its destruction. Rev. Day saw no distinction between the motive behind Israeli actions and the terrorist goals–again, Israel works to minimize civilian casualties, while Hezbollah and Hamas target civilians; Israel only seeks to protect its existence, while both Hezbollah and Hamas are dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish State.

Then there is their nasty habit of publishing books that can be construed as anti-Israel propaganda:

In 2004, the United Methodist Church passed a resolution calling for “members of each congregation to study the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from all perspectives.” The call for impartiality by the largest mainline Protestant church in the United States was a laudable one, but it has since become clear that for some Methodists fair-mindedness is not on the agenda.

Within the church there are various bodies that address specific subjects of concern to the whole denomination. One of these, the General Board of Global Ministries, embarked on a yearlong, church-wide “mission study” program on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To date the perspective presented by the program has been so predominantly Palestinian, and the effort to vilify Israel so transparent, that one can only conclude there is a campaign underway to persuade Methodists to support divestment at the denomination’s quadrennial General Conference next year.

The centerpiece of the mission study is a slick 220-page volume written by Reverend Stephen Goldstein. The book, which is published by the Women’s Division of the General Board of Global Ministries, is available for purchase on the United Methodist Church’s official Web site.

In both the bibliography and the book itself, some of Israel’s harshest critics — including Norman Finkelstein, Noam Chomsky, George Ball, Robert Fisk and Ilan Pappé — are given overwhelming representation. And the bibliography’s list of recommended videos, available from Americans for Middle East Understanding, feature titles like “Children of the Nakba,” “Palestine is Still the Issue” and “Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land.”(Source)

Following up on the last publishing venture, now the Methodist Church is publishing Anti-Israel children's books

The Methodist Child Indoctrination League

By Mark Tooley | 2/19/2008

Among the latest exploits of the United Methodist Women’s Division is a children’s book intended to instill anti-Israel themes among Methodist younsters. Innocuously called, “From Palestine to Seattle; Becoming Neighbors and Friends,” the booklet portrays Israel as an oppressor of Palestinians while omitting all mention of terrorism. It was written by Mary Davis, a former United Methodist missionary in “Palestine,” where she led “study tours,” whose political content no doubt was predictable.

The United Methodist Women’s Division, with over $60 million in assets, $30 million in annual income, and nearly 700,000 members, is one of the most powerful women’s groups in America. Its mostly older members, strung across over 30,000 local churches, earn money for their New York-based headquarters with bake sales, Christmas bazaars, and church suppers. Few among them realize that their donations fund causes of the radical left, including anti-Israel activism.

In the children’s story, a Seattle Methodist pastor just returned from “Palestine” shares a letter from a young Arab boy in Bethlehem with his own children. The Arab boy, Tarek, has never been to McDonald's because the closest one is in Jerusalem, and travel there requires a pass by the Israelis. Naturally, the American children are disturbed. In an ongoing pen pal exchange, Tarek asks the American children why their country thinks all Palestinians are terrorists. The Americans are embarrassed. They summon up the nerve to ask Tarek why passes are needed to travel to Jerusalem.

Tarek responds that Israeli soldiers require passes, and that Palestinians without them are turned away, whether they are going to their jobs, or to hospitals. “How can people be so unfair?” the American children ask their pastor father. The father is unsure how to answer. But he helps them begin another correspondence with a little Israeli girl, who recounts that her cousin, an Israeli soldier, has been imprisoned for refusing to guard the “checkpoints” because “they were wrong and they were hurting people.”

Fascinated by what they have learned about all this injustice, the American children decide to accompany a Methodist missionary to “Palestine.” They see for themselves the dreaded checkpoints. “Looking up, they saw a soldier with a gun sitting in a watch tower,” the book records ominously. A helpful illustration shows the van full of frightened American children surrounded by armed Israeli soldiers and lots of barbed wire. With their missionary guide and a local Presbyterian minister, the children journey on to Jerusalem, where they visit Tarek’s family.

The American boy is awakened at dawn by a “strange chanting voice,” but Tarek reassures him that it is only the Muslim call to prayer. Even more exciting, Tarek’s friend later invites the American children to a mosque. Of course, they love it! It has “beautiful crystal lights” and wonderful carpets. The imam explains that just as the body needs food, so does the soul need “prayer breaks.”

Coincidentally, the American children are in Bethlehem just in time for a “Children’s Peace March.” Hundreds of children assemble with clerics and local officials to march for “peace.” The Americans make their own sign proclaiming: “Seattle Kids for Peace.” After the march, the young demonstrators assemble at the Church of the Nativity.

The next day, the American children get ready to visit Jerusalem. Their Arab friends expect to be left behind, because they know “it is very unusual for West Bank children to cross the checkpoint into Jerusalem.” But the Presbyterian pastor surprises them with passes! He explains that Palestinians under 12 years of age can sometimes get passes. Why is this so? The concern about teen-age Palestinians is not explained, of course. Happily, the children journey together to Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and eventually Nazareth. The children also attend meetings of “Together,” an Israeli “peace” group. At the tour’s end, the children pledge to reconvene in America. “Today at the Sea of Galilee, Next year in Seattle!” they excitedly proclaim, spoofing the well known Jewish promise of “next year in Jerusalem.”

“From Palestine to Seattle” is accompanied by a more detailed teacher’s guide. “How would you feel if you were not allowed to visit a certain place?” the teacher is instructed to ask the children, so as to understand how Palestinians must hurt when Israel demands travel passes. “Say that Palestinians are sometimes not allowed to go into some areas of Israel,” the teachers are instructed. “Sometimes they are kept away from going to the places where they work or are kept away from their own farmlands.” The children are never told the reasons for this purportedly outrageous restriction. The children’s Israeli friend, Miriam, tells them of her fear about a “bomb.” But the children never hear who or what might ignite such a bomb. Unlike the helpful picture of the gun-toting Israeli soldiers scaring the children, there are no illustrations of Palestinian suicide bombers blowing up children and adults.

The teacher is also urged to ask the children to remember brave people who “took a stand,” like Martin Luther King, Jr. or Rosa Parks. Queen Esther and Daniel in the Bible are also cited. They are reminded of the Israeli soldier in the story who “took a stand” by refusing to man an Israeli checkpoint. There are no similar examples cited of taking a stand against Palestinian terror or Islamist repression. Presumably that would be too complex for the children, who are instead encouraged by the teacher’s guide to gather a pile of stones. They are to be told that in “Palestine,” stones can represent the rubble left when Israelis have bulldozed Palestinian homes for having done “something” against the Israeli government. Stones can “also be the means by which a young person resists the presence of Israeli soldiers in the town.” Palestinian youth “sometimes throw stones at the soldiers.” Likewise, in ancient times, the stones could “mark a holy place,” the teacher’s guide recalls, in a helpful comparison.

Teachers are asked to tell the children how the pass system for Palestinians resembles the pass system under Apartheid South Africa. “Apartheid is similar to the pass system that exists for Palestinians,” the teacher’s guide asserts. Then the children are to sample the injustice of the pass system themselves in a game in which some children are denied juice and grapes if they don’t have the right pass. Such fun! And such learning! The teachers are admonished: “Remind the children that when people are denied things that they believe everyone should have, they feel bad and sometimes they become angry.”

The children are asked to recreate the “Children’s Peace March,” to make placards and march in the hallway, while waving flags. There’s also a time for prayer. The children are asked to learn how Muslims pray by spreading a blanket on the floor and bowing their heads down five times as they pray for peace. “Share with children that sometimes courage is needed to resist evil,” the teacher’s guide sternly instructs.

Will future United Methodist Women’s Division books for children offer similar opportunities to “resist evil” on figurative trips to Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Iran, or Cuba? Perhaps the children could watch the Saudi religious police beat unveiled women, or visit North Korean secret prisons where dissidents are starving, or hear Iranian clerics call for liquidating the Jews, or witness Cuban secret police tear gas democracy demonstrators. Sadly, the left-wing activists at the Women’s Division New York headquarters, funded by the dollars from ten thousand church bake sales, do not have much interest in resisting those kinds of evil.

So Hillary the big question is do you AGREE with the Publishing ventures of your Church? If you don't isn't it time to speak out? If you remain silent do we assume that you do agree. In other words Senator Clinton, "Where's the Beef?"


Anonymous said...

Are you aware that President Bush is also a Methodist? Does he have to apologize for the Methodists too?

Charlie Hall said...

President George W. Bush belongs to the same church.

Unknown said...

this is how I responded to your town crying friend:

GROW UP and Get over it. Unless they changed the constitution while I was having my Cheerios this morning, President Bush isn't running. You can't vote against him anymore. Florida was almost eight years ago----MOVE On (no pun intended)

Maybe if you have a cup of decaf, a Valium and take a nap you will feel better afterwards.

The freeking article about the Methodists was an attempt to be fair to OBAMA. If you read the set up instead of rushing to protect the Junior Senator from New York you would have understood that. I didn't mention BUSH Because the article was about those who were running.

If you allowed comments on your blog like I do, I would have answered you that way, but since you don't I am forced to respond in the same silly way you spoke to me-- with a post. Thats not how adults talk but if you wish, so be it.

Unknown said...

Folks I am no longer accepting comments about Bush on this is not what this post is about.--it is about clinton and obama As Far as the Republican candidate I am in the middle of researching him and expect and article during the campaign when it matters

Anonymous said...

I am no fan of Hillary Clinton and don't know alot about Methodist doctrine (I detest organized religion) but I fail to see from your post how they are Anti-Israel. I have my own criticism of Israel just as I have crticism of the Unted States, Sudan, China, I could go on and on but does criticism automactically equate that I am anti what ever. I criticize my children, my friends, and again I could go on and on so does that mean I don't want them to exist?