Please Hit

Folks, This is a Free Site and will ALWAYS stay that way. But the only way I offset my expenses is through the donations of my readers. PLEASE Consider Making a Donation to Keep This Site Going. SO HIT THE TIP JAR (it's on the left-hand column).

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The History Lesson ABC's Brian Ross Never Had


ABC "journalist" Brian Ross must have failed World History or perhaps was absent the days they talked about fascism, the Nazis and the second world war.  Appearing on Good Morning America, Ross this morning, Ross misled America about history and about the sicko who shot up the Sikh Temple.

After explaining the shooter Wade Page's links to violent, bigoted groups, Good Morning America co-host George Stephanopoulos wondered how this murderer could have purchased a gun, Ross insisted that the FBI did not have "enough evidence to open a full field investigation because of his links to these right-wing, neo-Nazi groups." (source: Newsbusters)

Right-wing Neo-Nazi is an oxymoron like jumbo-shrimp, living dead, dark light and apparently ABC News and Unbiased Journalism.

The full name of the Nazi Party Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterparteitranslated into English is National Socialist German Workers' Party. Socialist? That doesn't seem very right wing does it?

Hitler and his Nazi party were sub-human mass murderers, they were also Fascist. Fascism is a subset of socialism just like Communism, Maoism, and Marxism and Obamanomics. Fascism saw itself as the midpoint between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism with its alleged class conflict wasteful competition and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it.
Gee that sounds a lot like Obama's anti-Bain Capital commercials.  But back to the issue at hand.  If the psycho who shot up the Sikh temple was indeed a neo-Nazi, then he believed in big government and some indirect governmental control of industry, in other words he fits on the extreme left side of the scale with the socialists and progressives.  If the psycho was an extremist on the right, he would be an anarchist, believing that there should be no government.

There! History lesson over.  Oh and please don't teach this to the progressives, the truth makes them cry.

No comments: