Global Warming Scientist Admits Their Computer Models May Be ALL SCREWED UP

The Scientists in the global warming hoaxer movement has been looking for excuses as to why the earth hasn't gotten warmer in over 15 years. One scientist has committed the ultimate hoaxer blasphemy, saying that if the trend continues their models could be “fundamentally wrong.”

Meteorologist Hans von Storch who still believes in the global warming myth, told Spiegel online:

“If things continue as they have been, in five years, at the latest, we will need to acknowledge that something is fundamentally wrong with our climate models. A 20-year pause in global warming does not occur in a single modeled scenario. But even today, we are finding it very difficult to reconcile actual temperature trends with our expectations.”

There are two conceivable explanations -- and neither is very pleasant for us. The first possibility is that less global warming is occurring than expected because greenhouse gases, especially CO₂, have less of an effect than we have assumed. This wouldn't mean that there is no man-made greenhouse effect, but simply that our effect on climate events is not as great as we have believed. The other possibility is that, in our simulations, we have underestimated how much the climate fluctuates owing to natural causes.

The IPCC (the UN's Global Warming group said by now  global temperatures would have risen 1 degree Celsius and 3 degrees. However, UK researchers recently reported that global temperatures will only rise between 0.9 degrees Celsius and 2.0 degrees Celsius. On the other hand the NY Times and the BBC have reported that global temperatures plateaued about 15 years ago agreeing with the Met office of the UK one of the key proponents of the Climate Change hoax.

Storch also committed heresy regarding another global warming hoaxer claim, that there global warming is settled science:

Certainly the greatest mistake of climate researchers has been giving the impression that they are declaring the definitive truth. The end result is foolishness along the lines of the climate protection brochures recently published by Germany's Federal Environmental Agency under the title "Sie erwärmt sich doch" ("The Earth is getting warmer"). Pamphlets like that aren't going to convince any skeptics. It's not a bad thing to make mistakes and have to correct them. The only thing that was bad was acting beforehand as if we were infallible. By doing so, we have gambled away the most important asset we have as scientists: the public's trust. We went through something similar with deforestation, too -- and then we didn't hear much about the topic for a long time.

 The scientist is still a believer in the hoax:

We still have compelling evidence of a man-made greenhouse effect. There is very little doubt about it. But if global warming continues to stagnate, doubts will obviously grow stronger.

As the global apocalypse predicted by the global warming hoaxers continues to be missing, there will be more cracks in their alliance.

Perhaps the hoaxers will even concede the point made clear by the United Nations' IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer:

But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.

 That's the real reason for this hoax, not environmental policy, but redistribution of worldwide income.