Regarding the inspections of nuclear facilities on military bases (PMDs) even before the framework deal was announced the Wall Street Journal reported that the US would allow Iran to delay letting the inspectors know what was being done in bases until all the sanctions were lifted. Which of course begs the question, why in the world would Iran agree to let inspectors on to their bases AFTER sanctions are lifted. Oh sure the sanctions can "snap back" as long as the U.S. can convince China and Russia (who is now selling missiles to Iran) not to veto the sanctions at the U.N. Security Council. Of course getting those two countries to allow the reimposing of sanctions is as likely as me waking up in the morning with hair covering my bald head.
Also on inspections, Ben Rhodes the Deputy National Security Adviser For Strategic Communication started floating language last week indicating a U.S. fold was imminent.. The administration's traditional language has been "we will do whatever the IAEA requires for verification". According to IAEA experts that means anytime, anywhere" they can inspect suspicious sites, including military sites. There can't be a system where the IAEA asks for permission, then the Iranians say 'prove to us you actually need access,' then a few weeks go by, then maybe inspectors get to go in or maybe they don't. The Iranians would just move or destroy the evidence while blocking inspectors - something they've actually done at Parchin and something that Saddam Hussein did very successfully. During a press conference held in Panama last week Ben Rhodes walked back from "anytime, anywhere," promise saying:
On the military sites, similarly, clearly there will have to be the ability for the IAEA to conduct inspections that are consistent with what’s in the framework, which includes resolving past issues of concern with the IAEA related to possible military dimensions of Iran’s program, as well as Iran joining the additional protocol and having the ability of the IAEA to inspect suspicious sites, no matter where they are, if the United States and other countries, again, present information and seek access through the IAEA to those sites.In other words in order to inspect the nuclear facilities on military bases, the U.S. has to ask the IAEA, who will ask Iran, who will hide everything before anybody is allowed to inspect.
During a joint press conference with Prime Minister Renzi of Italy, Obama was asked point blank whether he would rule out lifting Iran sanctions at time of nuclear deal. The President pointedly refused, instead talking about "creative negotiations."
With respect to the issue of sanctions coming down - I don't want to get out ahead of John Kerry and my negotiators in terms how to craft this. I would just make a general observation and that is that how sanctions are lessened, how we snap back sanctions if there's a violation - there are a lot of different mechanisms and ways to do that. Part of John's job and part of the Iranian negotiators' job and part of the P5+1's job is to sometimes find formulas that get to our main concerns while allowing the other side to make a presentation to their body politic that is more acceptable. Our main concern here is making sure that if Iran doesn't abide by its agreement that we don't have to jump through a whole bunch of hoops in order to reinstate sanctions. That's our main concern. And I think that goal, of having, in reserve, the possibility of putting back and applying forceful sanctions, in the event of a violation, that goal can be met. And it will require some creative negotiations by John Kerry and others, and I’m confident that we’ll be successful.Folks I have said it over and over, preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons is important for the safety of Israelis AND Americans. We are the big Satan. Sadly the way the tower of jello who sits in the White House is negotiating this deal... the U.S. is in grave danger.